Analisis Naratif Kisah Para Rasul 15:1-33: Inspirasi Teologis bagi Sinodalitas Gereja

Amadea Prajna Putra Mahardika

doi:10.30648/dun.v9i2.1493

Analisis Naratif Kisah Para Rasul 15:1-33: Inspirasi Teologis bagi Sinodalitas Gereja

Amadea Prajna Putra Mahardika

Abstract

Abstract. The purpose of this paper is to analyze Acts 15:1-33 and its relevance for the synodality of the Church. The research method used is narrative criticism on Acts 15:1-33. This paper finds that the synodality of the Church, namely the collaborative principle in church decision-making, has important relevance in handling conflicts and building church unity. The Council of Jerusalem can be a practical guide in terms of open communication, respect for various parties, and cooperation between church institutions.

Abstrak. Tujuan tulisan ini adalah untuk menganalisis Kisah Para Rasul 15:1-33 dan dan relevansinya bagi sinodalitas Gereja. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah analisis naratif terhadap Kisah Para Rasul 15:1-33. Tulisan ini menemukan bahwa sinodalitas Gereja, yaitu prinsip kolaboratif dalam pengambilan keputusan gerejawi, memiliki relevansi penting dalam penanganan konflik dan pembangunan persatuan Gereja. Konsili di Yerusalem dapat menjadi panduan praktis dalam hal komunikasi terbuka, penghargaan terhadap berbagai pihak, dan kerja sama antara institusi gerejawi.

Keywords

conflict; congregation; dialog; dialogue; gereja lokal; jemaat; konflik; local Church; persatuan; unity

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aryanto, Antonius Galih Arga W. “Aspek Sinodalitas Dalam Sidang Yerusalem (Kis. 15: 1-29).” In Sinodalitas Gereja: Tinjauan Dari Berbagai Aspek Filosofis Dan Teologis, edited by Emanuel P.D. Martasudjita. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2023.

Bar-Efart, Shimon. Narrative Art in the Bible. Decatur: The Almond Press, 1989.

Barrett, Charles K. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles. 2: Introduction and Commentary on Acts XV-XXVIII. Clark, 1998.

Bennema, Cornells. “Early Christian Identity Formation amidst Conflict.” Journal of Early Christian History 5, no. 1 (2015): 26–48.

Buru, Puplius Meinrad. “Pertengkaran Investitur, Paus Tandingan, Skisma, Heresi Dan Konsiliarisme: Tantangan Sinodalitas Gereja Di Era Konsili-Konsili Lateran.” In Sinodalitas Gereja: Tinjauan Dari Berbagai Aspek Filosofis Dan Teologis, edited by Emanuel P.D. Martasudjita. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2023.

Corniche, Salaam. “Acts 15: The Jerusalem Council Revisited.” St. Francis Magazine, 2010.

Doss, Gorden R. “The Jerusalem Council,” 2005.

Echols, Charles L. “A Guide to Basic Exegesis (Revised Version),” 2016. https://www.academia.edu/28729071/A_Guide_to_Basic_Exegesis_revised_version_.

Esti, Bernadetta. “Misa Syukur Peringatan HUT Ke-83 Keuskupan Agung Semarang.” Gereja Santa Perawan Maria Ratu Rosario Suci - Paroki Randusari - Katedral Semarang, 2023. https://katedralsemarang.or.id/misa-syukur-peringatan-hut-ke-83-keuskupan-agung-semarang/.

Fahy, T. “The Council of Jerusalem.” Irish Theological Quarterly 30, no. 3 (September 1, 1963): 232–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/002114006303000303/ASSET/002114006303000303.FP.PNG_V03.

Herianto, Tjatur. “Kebangkitan Yesus: Analisis Naratif Injil Lukas 23:56-24:12.” MELINTAS An International Journal of Philosophy and Religion (MIJPR) 35, no. 1 (July 7, 2019): 57–76. https://doi.org/10.26593/MEL.V35I1.4034.57-76.

Hunkin, J. W. “The Prohibitions of the Council at Jerusalem (Acts XV 28, 29).” The Journal of Theological Studies os-XXVII, no. 107 (April 1, 1926): 272–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/JTS/OS-XXVII.107.272.

Komisi Kitab Suci Kepausan. Penafsiran Alkitab Dalam Gereja. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius, 2007.

Lestang, François. “‘It Has Seemed Good to the Holy Spirit and to Us’ (Acts 15:29): Why Do We Need to Be Brothers?” Journal of the European Pentecostal Theological Association 35, no. 1 (April 2015): 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1179/1812446114Z.0000000004.

Marguerat, D., and Y. Borquin. How to Read Bible Stories: An Introduction to Narrative Criticism. London: SCM Press, 1999.

Mathews, Shailer. “The Council at Jerusalem.” The Biblical World 33, no. 5 (May 1909): 337–42. https://doi.org/10.1086/474194.

McMillan, David K. “Acts 15:22-31.” Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 55, no. 4 (October 1, 2001): 420–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002096430005500409.

Nolland, John. “A Fresh Look at Acts 15.10.” New Testament Studies 27, no. 1 (1980): 105–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688500010298.

Park, Hyung Dae. “Drawing Ethical Principles from the Process of the Jerusalem Council: A New Approach to Acts 15:4-29.” Tyndale Bulletin 61, no. 2 (2010): 271–91. https://doi.org/10.53751/001C.29289.

Powell, Mark Allan. What Is Narrative Criticism? Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1990.

Rhoads, David, and Donald Michie. Injil Markus Sebagai Cerita. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia, 1995.

Sandt, Huub Van de. “An Explanation of Acts 15.6-21 in the Light of Deuteronomy 4.29-35 (Lxx).” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 14, no. 46 (April 1, 1992): 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142064X9201404605.

Sternberg, Meir. The Poetics of Biblical Narrative: Ideological Literature and the Drama of Reading. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987.

Tarmedi, P. A. Didi. “Analisis Naratif: Sebuah Metode Kristiani Hermeneutika Kitab Suci.” MELINTAS 29, no. 3 (July 14, 2014): 331–60. http://journal.unpar.ac.id/index.php/melintas/article/view/902/889.

Tatum, Gregory. “Galatians 2: 1-14/Acts 15 and Paul’s Ministry in 1 Thessalonians and 1 Corinthians.” Revue Biblique 116, no. 1 (2009): 70–81. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44090922.

Taylor, Justin. “The Jerusalem Decrees (Acts 15.20, 29 and 21.25) and the Incident at Antioch (Gal 2.11–14).” New Testament Studies 47, no. 3 (2001): 372–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688501000224.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30648/dun.v9i2.1493