Evaluasi Program Sekolah Minggu Dengan Menggunakan Model Evaluasi CSE-UCLA

Desi Sianipar, Wellem Sairwona, Esti Regina Boiliu

Abstract


Abstract. As a form of non-formal education, Sunday School should also undergo evaluation procedures like educational programs in general. The results of this evaluation are very useful as information and a basis for developing the program in the future. Currently, there are many program evaluation models that can be utilized by program managers. One of them is the CSE-UCLA model. Therefore, the aim of this research is to see the effectiveness of using the CSE-UCLA model evaluation approach to evaluate the Sunday School program. The research method used in this research is a qualitative method. The result of the research showed that the CSE-UCLA evaluation model can be effectively used to evaluate educational programs, including education that has a religious spiritual atmosphere.

Abstrak. Sebagai satu bentuk pendidikan nonformal, Sekolah Minggu semestinya juga menjalani prosedur evaluasi sebagaimana program pendidikan pada umumnya. Hasil evaluasi tersebut sangat berguna sebagai informasi dan pijakan dalam pengembangan program tersebut di masa yang akan datang. Pada masa kini ada banyak model evaluasi program yang dapat dimanfaatkan oleh pengelola program. Salah satu di antaranya adalah model CSE-UCLA. Karena itu tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk melihat efektivitas penggunakan pendekatan evaluasi model CSE-UCLA untuk mengevaluasi program Sekolah Minggu. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model evaluasi CSE-UCLA dapat secara efektif digunakan untuk mengevaluasi program pendidikan, termasuk pendidikan yang bernafaskan spiritual keagamaan.


Keywords


Christian Religious Education; CSE-UCLA; evaluasi program; non-formal education; Pendidikan Agama Kristen; pendidikan non-formal; program evaluation; Sekolah Minggu; Sunday School

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aliyya, Rusi Rusmiati. Evaluation Model of Education Programs. India: Novateur Publication, 2020.

Alkin, Marvin C. Evaluation Essentials From A to Z. New York & London: The Guilford Press, 2011.

Amin, M. Syahruddin. “Pendekatan Alternatif Sebagai Strategi Evaluasi Program Pelatihan Daur Ulang Sampah Organik Dengan Metode Takakura.” Jurnal Kiprah 6, no. 1 (2018): 25–34. https://doi.org/10.31629/kiprah.v6i1.582.

Ananda, Rusydi, and Tien Rafida. Pengantar Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Medan: Perdana Publishing, 2017.

Anderson, Lorin W., and T. Neville Postlethwaite. Program Evaluation: Large-Scale and Small-Scale Studies. Belgium: UNESCO, 2007.

Andriani, Siska. “Evaluasi CSE-UCLA Pada Studi Proses Pembelajaran Matematika.” Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 5, no. 2 (2015): 167–75. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v6i2.46.

Bunnell, Peter Wayne. “Parental Involvement In Elementary Children’s Religious Education: A Phenomenological Approach. Dissertation.” Liberty University, 2016.

Christie, Christina A., and Anne T. Vo. Rancangan Model Evaluasi CSE-UCLA Dengan Modifikasi Menggunakan Weighted Product Dalam Rangka Optimalisasi Layanan Perpustakaan Digital Pada Perguruan Tinggi Komputer Di Bali. Edited by Christina A. Christie and Anne T. Vo. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc., 2015.

Coleman, Robert E. The Master Plan of Evangelism: Rencana Pelayanan Kristus Untuk Menjangkau Dunia. Jakarta: Katalis Media, 2018.

Divayana, Dewa Gede Hendra, Agus Adiarta, and Ida Bagus Gede Surya Abadi. “Development of CSE-UCLA Evaluation Model Modified by Using Weighted Product in Order to Optimize Digital Library Services in Higher Education of Computer in Bali.” Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi 7, no. 3 (2017): 275–87. https://doi.org/10.21831/JPV.V7I3.13370.

Hafashimana, Gilbert. “Determining Parental Involvement in the Sunday School of Burundi Free Methodist Church in Buterere Parish.” Open Journal of Social Sciences 10, no. 12 (2022): 392–406. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2022.1012026.

Hidhayati, Wildani. “Evaluation of Memories Learning Program Al-Qur’an as a Local Curriculum at MTs.N 7 Modur Jakarta Timur (Evaluative Research Using CSE-UCLA Models).” Journal of Indonesian Student Assessment and Evaluation (JISAE) 4, no. 2 (2018): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21009/jisae.v4i2.8289.

Laia, Harman Ziduhu, Goktondi Pasaribu, and Ponco Mujiono Basuki. “Theology of Christian Education in Matthew 28:18-19.” Journal Didaskalia 5, no. 2 (2022): 74–80.

MacLaren, Alexander. “The Rash Builder (Luke 14:28).” Blue Letter Bible, n.d. https://www.blueletterbible.org/comm/maclaren_alexander/expositions-of-holy-scripture/luke/the-rash-builder.cfm.

Malelak, Erly O. Merdeka Menulis Tentang Merdeka Belajar. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Deepublish, 2022.

Mathison, Sandra, ed. Encyclopedia of Evaluation. California: Sage Publications, Inc., 2005.

Maulana. Ragam Model Pembelajaran Di Sekolah Dasar. 2nd ed. Sumedang: UPI Sumedang Press, n.d.

Musringudin, Abd. Rahman A. Gani, and Dwi Priyono. Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Bandung: Penerbit Media Sains Indonesia, 2022.

Prastowo, Andi. Menyusun Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (RPP) Tematik Terpadu: Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Untuk SD/MI. Jakarta: Kencana, 2015.

Royse, David, Bruce A. Thyer, and Deborah K. Padgett. Program Evaluation: An Introduction to an Evidence- Based Approach. Sixth Edition. USA: Cengage Learning, 2016.

Santosa, Rivosa, Nira Olyvia, and Victor Deak. “The Relationship Between Christian Religious Education And The Great Commission Matthew 28:19-20.” International Journal Of Sociology, Policy And Law (IJOSPL) 2, no. 4 (2021): 66–72. https://doi.org/10.8888/ijospl.v2i4.78.

Siregar, Ivo Christiana. “Competence of Sunday School Teachers In Carrying Out The Great Commission of Matthew 28:19-20 Through Education In Sunday School.” Eduvest – Journal of Universal Studies 3, no. 3 (2023): 586–93. https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v3i3.724.

Sutanto Leo. Kiat Sukses Mengelola Dan Mengajar Sekolah Minggu. Yogyakarta: ANDI, 2008.

Suyasa, P. Wayan Arta, and Putu Sukma Kurniawan. “Pemberdayaan Model CSE-UCLA Dalam Pelaksanaan Evaluasi Program Blended Learning Di SMA Negeri 1 Ubud.” Jurnal Wacana Akademika 2, no. 2 (2018): 137–62. https://doi.org/10.30738/wa.v2i2.2627.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30648/dun.v8i2.1073

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 599 times
PDF - 264 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 DUNAMIS: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristiani

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Dunamis telah terdaftar pada situs:

View My Stats

Online ISSN : 2541-3945

Printed ISSN : 2541-3937

Copyright © Jurnal Dunamis 2016. All Rights Reserved.